The Regulations Development of Objection Against the Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) Decision

Zil Aidi

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the regulation development of objection against the KPPU's decision after the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3/2021 and its implementation. The research is descriptive with normative juridical type, using primary data through interviews and secondary data through library research, using qualitative analysis and logical deduction reasoning. There are differences in absolute competence, timeframe, and case examination between PERMA No.3/2021 with previous arrangements. This PERMA has been implemented at the Commercial Courts of Central Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. In addition, the transfer of absolute competence to the Commercial Court makes the performance of the KPPU's litigation team more efficient because it no longer needs to travel to many cities to face objections, considering the Commercial Court is only domiciled in 5 regions throughout Indonesia. Commercial Court judges should also understand business law better and be expected to produce quality decisions.

Keywords


Commercial Court; Competition Law; Objection.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, Rumadi, et al., Fikih Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: Lakpesdam PBNU, 2019.

Aidi, Zil, and Hasna Farida. "Regulatory Development of Objection Legal Efforts to the Indonesia Competition Commission ( KPPU ) Decision After the Enactment of Law No. 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation," Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Economic, Governance, ICOLEG 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2021.2312663.

Busroh, Firman Freaddy. “Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi Pertanahan.†Arena Hukum 10, No. 2 (2017): 227-250. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.4.

Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. “Konsep Keadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Perdata.†Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 21, No. 2 (2009): 355-369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16262.

Fitriadi, Mireza, Mohamad Yudha Prawira, and Zil Aidi. "Economic Policy Package: How Policy Delivery Affects Business Competition." Proceeding International Seminar on Competition Policy and Law (2017). 12-26.

Indonesia. Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.

_________. Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.

_________. Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.

_________. Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Submission and Examination of Objections to the Decision of the Indonesia Competition Commission / KPPU in the Commercial Court.

_________. Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2021 concerning the Transition of the Examination of Objections to the Decision of the Indonesian Competition Commission / KPPU to the Commercial Court.

Law Office Lubis, Santosa, Maulana. Kumpulan Dokumen Publik. Jakarta: Law Office Lubis, Santosa, Maulana, 2002.

Mantili, Rai. “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum.†Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, No. 1 (2016): 122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a7.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.

Nusantara, Abdul Hakim G., et.al. Litigasi Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat: Competition Litigation. Tangerang: Telaga Ilmu Indonesia, 2010.

Sidauruk, Gloria Damaiyanti. “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha.†Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, No. 1 (2021): 132-151. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss1.art10.

Sodikin, “Paradigma Undang-Undang Dengan Konsep Omnibus Law Berkaitan Dengan Norma Hukum Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia,†Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, No. 1 (2020): 143-160. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.393.

Suardana, A. A Gede Angga Putra, and I Gusti Ayu Agung Ari Krisnawati. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Terkait Pemeriksaan Keberatan Putusan Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha.†Kertha Desa 9, No. 10 (2020): 39-51. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthadesa/article/view/79595.

Tektona, Rahmadi. “Quo Vadis : Kepastian Hukum Aturan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.†Jurnal Persaingan Usaha 2, No. 1 (2022): 43-54. https://doi.org/10.55869/kppu.v3i-.51




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v7i1.572

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Zil Aidi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika is Indexed on :

Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika (ISSN Online: 2549-0753 |ISSN Print:2549-0664) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License