State Responsibility in Post-Judgment Reforestation Following Environmental Fines

Authors

  • Cakra Tona Parhusip Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Triono Eddy Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Adi Mansar Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Ena Kazić Çakar Faculty of Law, International University of Saravejo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Keywords:

Civil Liability, Ecological Justice, Environmental Restoration, Legal Enforcement, Regulatory Reform

Abstract

This paper critically examines the normative limitations and institutional challenges in enforcing ecological restoration through Indonesia’s environmental legal regime. While civil liability is increasingly employed as a formal mechanism to ensure environmental responsibility, the link between judicially imposed compensation and actual ecological recovery remains tenuous. Drawing on a normative legal approach, supported by doctrinal and comparative analysis, this study unpacks how the absence of a binding legal obligation to allocate environmental fines toward restoration efforts weakens the transformative potential of civil sanctions. It reveals a structural gap: courts may award environmental damages, yet the disbursement and utilization of these funds often fall into administrative obscurity, lacking transparency and measurable ecological outcomes. The argument advanced is that environmental accountability should not terminate with compensation; it must continue toward tangible rehabilitation anchored in public participation and legal oversight. The findings suggest the necessity of reformulating regulatory design, particularly by mandating the use of compensation funds for ecological purposes and embedding oversight mechanisms to monitor compliance. Such reform aligns with broader global calls to shift environmental enforcement from punitive to restorative justice frameworks. This contribution opens normative space for rethinking how environmental damages can be institutionally linked to actual restoration, beyond symbolic legality.

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Benjamin Faude. ‘Hybrid Institutional Complexes in Global Governance’. The Review of International Organizations 17, No. 2 (April 2022): 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09431-3.

Astuti, Rini, and Yuti A. Fatimah. ‘Science in the Court: Expert Knowledge and Forest Fires on Indonesia’s Plantations’. Environmental Science & Policy 151 (January 2024): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103631.

Betsill, Michele M., Ashley Enrici, Elodie Le Cornu, and Rebecca L. Gruby. ‘Philanthropic Foundations as Agents of Environmental Governance: A Research Agenda’. Environmental Politics 31, No. 4 (June 2022): 684-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1955494.

Borras Jr., Saturnino M., and Jennifer C. Franco. ‘The Challenge of Locating Land-Based Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Politics within a Social Justice Perspective: Towards an Idea of Agrarian Climate Justice’. Third World Quarterly 39, No. 7 (July 2018): 1308-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1460592.

Bostancı, Seda H. ‘The Role of Local Governments in Encouraging Participation in Reforestation Activities’. In The Route Towards Global Sustainability, 25-44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10437-4_2.

Brondi, Sonia, Giacomo Chiara, and Elisa Matutini. ‘Navigating Environmental Justice Framework: A Scoping Literature Review Over Four Decades’. Environmental Justice 18, No. 3 (June 2025): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2024.0054.

De Mello, Luiz, and João Tovar Jalles. ‘Decentralization and the Environment: Cross-Country Evidence’. Applied Economics 56, No. 57 (December 2024): 7960-7970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2313607.

Driessen, Peter P. J., Carel Dieperink, Frank Van Laerhoven, Hens A. C. Runhaar, and Walter J. V. Vermeulen. ‘Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance-Experiences From The Netherlands’. Environmental Policy and Governance 22, No. 3 (May 2012): 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580.

Evans, James, and Craig Thomas. Environmental Governance. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334699.

Faure, M. G., and K. Svatikova. ‘Criminal or Administrative Law to Protect the Environment? Evidence from Western Europe’. Journal of Environmental Law 24, No. 2 (July 2012): 253-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs005.

Fontaine, Guillaume, Camila Carrasco, and Carlos Rodrigues. ‘How Transparency Enhances Public Accountability: The Case of Environmental Governance in Chile’. The Extractive Industries and Society 9 (March 2022): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.101040.

Gazzani, Flavio. ‘Transition to Social-Ecological Sustainability Using the Environmental Fiscal Reform’. International Journal of Social Economics 48, No. 5 (May 2021): 675-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-09-2020-0656.

Gürtler, Konrad. ‘Justice in Energy Transformations as a Spatial Phenomenon: A Framework for Analyzing Multi-Dimensional Justice Claims’. Energy Research & Social Science 105 (November 2023): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103277.

Hamdi, Hamdi, Agus Sugiarto, and Mahatidanar Hidayat. ‘Optimizing Civil Procedural Law in Environmental Cases Related to Peatland Burning: Legal Approaches for Sustainable Peatland Management’. Lex Publica 10, No. 2 (December 2023): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.2.2023.1-22.

Hobbs, R. J., and J. A. Harris. ‘Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium’. Restoration Ecology 9, No. 2 (2001): 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x.

Kitagawa, Fumi. ‘Lessons from the Japanese “Regional Revitalisation”- Impacts of Regional Industrial Policies through Decentralisation’. Contemporary Social Science 19, No. 4 (August 2024): 602-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2024.2433018.

Kotzé, Louis. ‘A Global Environmental Constitution for the Anthropocene?’ Transnational Environmental Law 8, No. 1 (March 2019): 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102518000274.

Kotzé, Louis J. ‘Earth System Law for the Anthropocene’. Sustainability 11, No. 23 (January 2019): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236796.

Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah, N. Nurmala, A. Arviansyah, and Sigit Sulistiyo Wibowo. ‘Indicators of Community Preparedness for Fast-Onset Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Study’. Natural Hazards 110, No. 1 (January 2022): 787-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04970-9.

Rohmy, Atikah Mardhiya, Hartiwiningsih, and I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani. ‘Judicial Mafia and Ecological In-Justice: Obstacles to Policy Enforcement in Indonesian Forest Management and Protection’. Trees, Forests and People 17 (September 2024): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100613.

Schwaiger, Jakob, Zaira M. Tas Kronenburg, Andre Auch, Thijs Bosker, and David Ehrhardt. ‘Customary Authorities and Environmental Governance in Africa: A Systematic Review’. Society & Natural Resources 37, No. 8 (August 2024): 1199-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2338781.

Vatn, Arild. ‘Environmental Governance- From Public to Private?’ Ecological Economics 148 (June 2018): 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.010.

Wu, Rong, and Shuang Ling. ‘The Effect of the Accountability System in Promoting Environmental Conflict Governance: An Evolutionary Game Analysis’. Environment, Development and Sustainability 27, No. 3 (December 2023): 7727-7756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04218-5.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

Issue

Section

Full Article