Alternatives to Imprisonment as an Effort to Overcome Overcrowding in Correctional Institutions

Authors

  • Diah Pudjiastuti Criminal Justice Studies Program, International Women University, Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0761-4255
  • Dey Ravena Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v9i1.4275

Keywords:

Alternative, Imprisonment or Prison Sentence, Overcapacity, Correctional Institution or Prison.

Abstract

The high crime rate and overcapacity in correctional institutions underscore the necessity of examining the effectiveness of prison sentences and exploring fairer alternative sanctions. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of prison sentences within the criminal justice system and identify ideal criminal sanctions to achieve justice. The study employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive approach. The findings reveal that prison sentences carry negative consequences, including stigmatization and challenges in social reintegration. To enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement and realize justice, the study recommends adopting restorative justice approaches, strengthening preventive measures, and integrating non-legal considerations into law enforcement. Thus, this research contributes to shaping criminal law policies that are not solely repressive but also preventive and rehabilitative. It advocates for the development of a legal system adaptable to the challenges of overcapacity in correctional institutions, promoting a balance between repression, prevention, and rehabilitation for a more equitable and sustainable justice framework.

References

Adam, Panji. “Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Penjara Dalam Jarîmah Ta’Zîr.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam) 2, No. 2 (2019): 39–66. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v2i2.5114.

Akmal, Fachrurrozy. “Penologi Pengayoman: Sebuah Tinjauan Pemidanaan Dalam Integrasi Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Khatulistiwa Law Review 1, No. 1 (2020): 39–60. http://e-journal.iainptk.ac.id/index.php/khalrev/article/view/36/24.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Legislatif Dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip, 1996.

Bahiej, Ahmad. “Arah dan Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia,” Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 1, No. 2 (2012), https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v1i2.1920.

Gunawan, T. J.. Konsep Pemidanaan Berbasis Nilai Kerugian Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Hambali, Azwad Rachmat. “Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana,” Kalabbirang Law Journal 2, No. 1 (2020).

Harwika, Dara Manista. Amelia Puspitasari. Erli Kurnia Parmasari. dan Indra Silfiyah. “Peran Kriminologi Sebagai Ilmu Bantu Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus Pembunuhan Cakung).” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 1, No. 3 (2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v1i03.9.

Husin, Kadri dan Budi Riski Husin. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Kania, Dede. “Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia,” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 3, No. 2 (2014).

Prasetya, Rendra Kurniawan. “Diversi Dan Pelaku Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas.” Dih Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, No. 24 (2016).

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Sisi-Sisi Lain Dari Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2001.

Rasad, Fauziah. “Perubahan Pidana Mati Menjadi Pidana Penjara Melalui Pemidanaan Secara Alternatif (The Conversion Of The Death Penalty Into Imprisonment Through The Alternative Punishment).” Jurnal HAM 12, No. 1 (2021): 141–164.

Ravena, Dey, “Implikasi Nilai Keadilan Pembinaan Narapidana Di Indonesia,” Scientica 4, No. 1 (2017).

__________, Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Tinjauan Perspektif Sejarah, Konsep Dan Teori, Asas Dan Prinsip, Model/Bentuk, Perbandingan Hukum Dan Pelaksanaannya Di Indonesia (Bandung: Nuansa Indah Permata Bandung, 2024).

Santoso, M. Agus. Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Sari, Meli Indah, dan Hafrida Hafrida. “Penerapan Pidana Penjara Sebagai Pengganti Pidana Denda Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, No. 1 (2021): 38–53. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8260.

Sholehuddin, M. Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Double Track System Dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2007.

Widi, Shilvina. “Overkapasitas Lapas RI Capai 89,35% Hingga Akhir Maret 2023.” dataindonesia.id, 2023. https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/overkapasitas-lapas-ri-capai-8935-hingga-akhir-maret-2023, diakses 20 April 2024

Sinaga, Christine Juliana. “Kajian Terhadap Pidana Penjara Sebagai Subsidair Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 1, No. 2 (2017): 191, https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v1i2.134.

Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua. “Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Penegakan Hukum Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia,” Res Nullius Law Journal 1, No. 1 (2019): 26–36, https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/2492/1696.

Solomon, Okwendi Joseph and Richard Nwankwoala. “The Role of Restorative Justice in Complementing the Justice System and Restoring Community Values in Nigeria.” Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2, No. 3 (2014): 126–37.

Suhariyanto, Budi. Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime): Urgensi Pengaturan Dan Celah Hukumnya. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2013.

Syamsu, M. Ainul. Penjatuhan Pidana & Dua Prinsip Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.

Wardhani, Ni Made Kusuma dan I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Ancaman Pidana Penjara Tujuh Tahun Atau Lebih.” Kertha Wicara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 07, No. 03 (2012): 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

Issue

Section

Full Article