The Role of Visum et Repertum (VeR) and VeR Psychiatricum (Legal Study of FD Murder Cases in Jakarta, 2023)

Rospita Adelina Siregar; Dyandra Eunike Nauli Sinaga

doi:10.25072/jwy.v7i2.4257

The Role of Visum et Repertum (VeR) and VeR Psychiatricum (Legal Study of FD Murder Cases in Jakarta, 2023)

Rospita Adelina Siregar, Dyandra Eunike Nauli Sinaga

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the role of law in handling the FD death case in Jakarta and its impact on the criminal justice system. The method used is normative juridical research with a statute approach and case approach. The results showed that during the examination of the suspect, an inconsistent change in attitude led to the decision to refer to the Police Hospital. The Psychiatric VeR stated that the suspect had a mental disorder of schizophrenia depression, thus following the provisions of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. According to Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, the suspect's actions cannot be accounted for due to mental disability, so he cannot be convicted. This finding underlines the important role of law and psychiatry in determining the criminal responsibility of a person with mental illness, contributing to the reform of a fairer and more humane justice system.

Keywords

Evidence; Expert information; Visum et repertum psychiatry.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abduh, Rachmad. “Kajian Hukum Rekam Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti Malapraktik Medis.” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, No. 1 (2021): 221-33. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v6i1.4661.

Astuti, Revi, and Indra Yudha Koswara. “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Konkrit Dalam Mencari Kebenaran Materiil Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 5, No. 2 (2021): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v5i2.3434.

Cahyani, Ni Putu Mega, I Nyoman Sujana, and Made Minggu Widiantara. “Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, No. 1 (2021): 122-128. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.122-128.

Ekoyusmario, Muh, Humaerah, and Abdul Agis. “Kekuatan Hukum Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan: Studi Polres Enrekang.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS 1, No. 4 (2020): 489-500. https://

doi.org/10.52103/jlg.v1i4.173.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Hulu, Idola Putra. “Legalitas Pembuktian Dalam Persidangan Secara Virtual Ditinjau Dari Hukum Acara Pidana.” IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 3, No. 2 (2022): 171-183. https://doi. org/10.55357/is.v3i2.245.

Karim. Peranan Hukum Forensik Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2023.

Kusmira, N P. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Penilaian Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum Dalam Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Nomor: 92/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Skt.).” Jurnal Verstek 4, No. 3 (2016): 136-45. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38772.

Monita, Yulia, and Dheny Wahyudi. Peranan Dokter Forensik Dalam Pembuktian. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2015.

Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana. Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik (Interaksi Dan Dependensi Hukum Pada Ilmu Kedokteran). Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya, 2016.

Paripurna, Amira, Astutik, Prilian Cahyani, and Riza Alifianto Kurniawan. Viktimologi Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2021.

Prasetyo, Yogi, Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, Indiantoro, Absori, and Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja. “Forensic Medicine in Indonesia: The Application of Visum et Repertum in Case Resolution.” Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 14, No. 4 (2020): 4100-4105. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12283.

Pratami, Zahrah Putri Arum Nabilah. “Peran Visum ET Repertum Dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perkosaan.” Justitia 8, No. 6 (2021): 1388-1399. http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v8i6.1388-1399,p. 1390.

Pujaningrum, Dyah Retno. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum Et Repertum Pada Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Yang Dilakukan Secara Paksa Terhadap Anak (Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 121/Pid.Sus/PN.Kdl/2020).” Jurnal Verstek 10, No. 1 (2022): 137-146. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i1.64046.

Ramadhan, Alfano. “Diskresi Penyidik Polri Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Perkara Pidana.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, No. 1 (2021): 25-41. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss1.art3.

Rumega, I Wayan Gede. “Hakim Komisaris Dan Miscarriage of Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, No. 1 (2019): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.53-68.

Sahali, Gustilawati, Fenty U Puluhulawa, and Avelia Rahmah Y Mantali. “Visum ET Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora Dan Seni (JISHS) 1, No. 2 (2023): 342-348. https://doi.org/10.47233/jishs.v1i2.773.

Salim, Desy Natalia, Ruslan Renggong, and Baso Madiong. “Efektivitas Dokter Kepolisian Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan.” Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law 2, No. 2 (2020): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v2i2.477.

_____. Kedokteran Forensik Persfektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Gowa: Pusaka

Almaida, 2021.

Siregar, Ramli, and Robi Krisna. “Analisis Hukum Kekuatan Pembuktian Ahli Forensik Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat.” INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, No. 1 (2023): 9337-9349. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i4.4711.

Sobari, Herlin, and Maharani Nurdin. “Peran Psikiatri Dalam Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Visum et Repertum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8, No. 15 (2022): 276-282. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7049268.

Suswanto, Beni, Irabiah, and Muhammad Ali Alala Mafing. “Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Melalui Visum (Studi Kasus Puskesmas Tanggetada).” Jurnal Qistie 16, No. 1 (2023): 122-138. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v16i1.7815.

Zega, Reichella Averina Jessica, Olga A. Pangkerego, and Evie Sompie. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Ahli Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 10, No. 5 (2021): 169-178. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33435.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v7i2.4257